Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21069506›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2010

[Thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma surgery: S3 guidelines and significance of the amendment for trauma surgeons].

S Haas, S Siebenlist, C Waydhas, R Krauspe, U Stöckle

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S HaasInstitut für Experimentelle Onkologie und Therapieforschung, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. sylvia.haas@lrz.tum.de
S Siebenlist
C Waydhas
R Krauspe
U Stöckle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention of venous thromboembolism has become an integral component of trauma surgery treatment and consists of physical and pharmacological measures. The indications and choice of prophylaxis modalities depend on the patient's individual risk profile which is determined by the combination of exposing and predisposing risk factors. The exposing risk is characterized by the type and extent of surgery or trauma, whereas the predisposing risk relates to patient inherent risk factors. This has also been considered in the compilation of the guidelines. This review summarizes the recommendations of the German S3 guidelines relating to trauma surgery and also discusses the amendment referring to the registration of the new oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate. The availability of these new compounds increases the spectrum of prophylaxis modalities thereby creating a need for new information in trauma surgery.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicGermanyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsThromboembolismTraumatologyWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.