Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21068761›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2010

An update on new oral PDE5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Victor Palit, Ian Eardley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor PalitUniversity Hospital of North Tees, Hardwick Road, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland TS19 8PE, UK.
Ian Eardley
St James's University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of North Tees · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been revolutionized by the discovery of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, which have been commercially available for more than a decade and are the first-line therapeutic option for men with ED. Sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil were approved by the European Medicine Agency and the US FDA for the treatment of ED on the back of their high efficacy rates and favorable safety profiles. However, despite the fact that more than 50 million patients with ED worldwide have been successfully treated with one of these PDE5 inhibitors, some men--most notably those with severe neurologic damage, diabetes mellitus or severe vascular disease--are resistant to the currently available drugs and require more-invasive treatments, such as intracavernosal injection therapy. Partly as a consequence of this, research into alternative therapeutic approaches continues, including the development of new PDE5 inhibitors, centrally acting pharmaceutical agents, and application of molecular technologies such as gene therapy and stem cell therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21068761
OpenAlexW2028692035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.