ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011
Comparison of conventional, nested, and real-time quantitative PCR for diagnosis of scrub typhus.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Compact Closed Genome ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Commercially Available Serological and Molecular Tests for Detection ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Tissue distribution of Orientia tsutsugamushi in rodents: a molecular and immune diagnostic approach.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Neglected and lethal: Case series of fatal scrub typhus in Malaysia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Severe Scrub Typhus with Acute Kidney Injury: Urine PCR Evidence from an East Coast Malaysian Cluster.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence of scrub typhus among patients with acute febrile illness: A study from northern districts of West Bengal.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025Article
- Detection and molecular identification of scrub typhus vectors and pathogens from rice field rats, a traditional food item of Mizo tribes in Mizoram, Northeast India.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Epidemiological features of scrub typhus and molecular characteristics ofIJID regions · 2025Article
- A CRISPR-Cas12a-based universal rapid scrub typhus diagnostic method targeting 16S rRNA of Orientia tsutsugamushi.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Detection Platform for Early and Rapid Diagnosis of Scrub Typhus.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Genomic bacterial load associated with bacterial genotypes and clinical characteristics in patients with scrub typhus in Hainan Island, Southern China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- GroEL Chaperonin-Based Assay for Early Diagnosis of Scrub Typhus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Utility of Multi-target Nested PCR and ELISPOT Assays for the Detection of Paucibacillary Leprosy: A Possible Conclusion of Clinical Laboratory Misdiagnosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Rapid characterization of feline leukemia virus infective stages by a novel nested recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and reverse transcriptase-RPA.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Clinical usefulness of 16S ribosomal RNA real-time PCR for the diagnosis of scrub typhus.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Performance of molecular and serologic tests for the diagnosis of scrub typhus.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orientia tsutsugamushi is the causative agent of scrub typhus. For the diagnosis of scrub typhus, we investigated the performances of conventional PCR (C-PCR), nested PCR (N-PCR), and real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) targeting the O. tsutsugamushi-specific 47-kDa gene. To compare the detection sensitivities of the three techniques, we used two template systems that used plasmid DNA (plasmid detection sensitivity), including a partial region of the 47-kDa gene, and genomic DNA (genomic detection sensitivity) from a buffy coat sample of a single patient. The plasmid detection sensitivities of C-PCR, N-PCR, and Q-PCR were 5 × 10(4) copies/μl, 5 copies/μl, and 50 copies/μl, respectively. The results of C-PCR, N-PCR, and Q-PCR performed with undiluted genomic DNA were negative, positive, and positive, respectively. The genomic detection sensitivities of N-PCR and Q-PCR were 64-fold and 16-fold (crossing point [Cp], 37.7; 426 copies/μl), respectively. For relative quantification of O. tsutsugamushi bacteria per volume of whole blood, we performed real-time DNA PCR analysis of the human GAPDH gene, along with the O. tsutsugamushi 47-kDa gene. At a 16-fold dilution, the copy number and genomic equivalent (GE) of GAPDH were 1.1 × 10(5) copies/μl (Cp, 22.64) and 5.5 × 10(4) GEs/μl, respectively. Therefore, the relative concentration of O. tsutsugamushi at a 16-fold dilution was 0.0078 organism/one white blood cell (WBC) and 117 organisms/μl of whole blood, because the WBC count of the patient was 1.5 × 10(4) cells/μl of whole blood. The sensitivities of C-PCR, N-PCR, and Q-PCR performed with blood samples taken from patients within 4 weeks of onset of fever were 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 19.9), 85.4% (95% CI, 70.8 to 94.4), and 82.9% (95% CI, 67.9 to 92.8), respectively. All evaluated assays were 100% specific for O. tsutsugamushi. In conclusion, given its combined sensitivity, specificity, and speed, Q-PCR is the preferred assay for the diagnosis of scrub typhus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.