Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21068204›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2011

Effect of oral snus and medicinal nicotine in smokers on toxicant exposure and withdrawal symptoms: a feasibility study.

Michael Kotlyar, Louise A Hertsgaard, Bruce R Lindgren, Joni A Jensen, Steven G Carmella, Irina Stepanov, Sharon E Murphy, Stephen S Hecht, Dorothy K Hatsukami

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00469079 (Comparing the Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco, Cigarette Smoking, and New Tobacco Products Advertised as Safer Alternatives Part of Tobacco Exposure Reduction), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00469079 phase2completednot on this map

Comparing the Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco, Cigarette Smoking, and New Tobacco Products Advertised as Safer Alternatives Part of Tobacco Exposure Reduction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2007 to 2009Enrolled130ConditionsNicotine DependenceArmsNicotine gum and lozenge, Taboka, Camel Snus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Switching from usual brand cigarettes to a tobacco-heating cigarette or snus: Part 2. Biomarkers of exposure.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Consortium on Methods Evaluating Tobacco: Research Tools to Inform US Food and Drug Administration Regulation of Snus.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Review
  14. Perceptions of Snus Among US Adult Smokers Given Free Product.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
  15. Biomarkers of exposure to new and emerging tobacco delivery products.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Subjective responses to oral tobacco products: scale validation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael KotlyarUniversity of Minnesota Tobacco Use Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Louise A Hertsgaard
Bruce R Lindgren
Joni A Jensen
Steven G Carmella
Irina Stepanov
Sharon E Murphy
Stephen S Hecht
Dorothy K Hatsukami
University of Minnesota · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

TOBACCO REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASEP50DA013333 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI PENTEL, PAUL R · 1999 to 2008
$16.8M
Smoking, Antidepressants and Response to Mental StressK23DA017307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KOTLYAR, MICHAEL · 2005 to 2009
$693k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA017307NIDA NIH HHS K23DA017307NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA01333NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA013333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmokeless, spitless tobacco products are being introduced and marketed as cigarette substitutes. Data are needed regarding how smokers interested in cessation would use these products, the levels of resultant toxicant exposure, and the feasibility of using these products as aids for tobacco cessation.

methodsSmokers were randomized to receive Camel Snus (n = 51), Taboka (n = 52), or medicinal nicotine (n = 27) and required to quit smoking for 4 weeks. Measures of toxicant exposure and symptoms of craving and withdrawal were assessed prior to and during product use.

resultsConcentrations of exhaled carbon monoxide, urinary cotinine, urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), and urinary N'-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide (total NNN) were significantly (P values <0.05) lower at the end of treatment in each group except for total NNN in those receiving Camel Snus (P = 0.066). A significant group × time effect was observed for total NNAL concentrations (P = 0.002) with the decrease greatest in the medicinal nicotine group and smallest decrease in the Camel Snus group. No significant differences between groups were found in craving and withdrawal symptoms.

conclusionsEnrolling smokers into a cessation study utilizing newer smokeless tobacco products is feasible. Camel Snus and Taboka use was not found to be superior to medicinal nicotine in reducing withdrawal symptoms but decreases in NNAL were smaller in users of Camel Snus. IMPACT: This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a smoking cessation study utilizing these newer tobacco products. An appropriately powered study is needed to assess smoking cessation rates using these newer products compared with established, safer products such as medicinal nicotine.

Indexed as

Tobacco, SmokelessAdolescentAdultAgedCarbon MonoxideCotinineFeasibility StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNicotineNitrosaminesPyridinesSmokingSmoking CessationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeYoung Adult4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butan-1-ol4-(N-methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanoneCarbon MonoxideCotinineNicotineNitrosaminesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID21068204
PMCPMC3063713
OpenAlexW2132142354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.