Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21068000›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary.

R Dustin Schaeffer, Amanda L Jonsson, Andrew M Simms, Valerie Daggett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shared unfolding pathways of unrelated immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein Simulation Data in the Relational Model.The Journal of supercomputing · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Wavelet Analysis of Protein Motion.International journal of wavelets, multiresolution and information processing · 2012
    Article
  17. The effect of context on the folding of β-hairpins.Journal of structural biology · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Dustin SchaefferBiomolecular Structure and Design Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5013, USA.
Amanda L Jonsson
Andrew M Simms
Valerie Daggett

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF PROTEIN UNFOLDINGR01GM050789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAGGETT, VALERIE D · 2000 to 2014
$3.9M
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF PROTEIN UNFOLDINGR29GM050789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAGGETT, VALERIE D · 1995 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM50789NLM NIH HHS TG 3 T15 LM007442-04S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe discovery of new protein folds is a relatively rare occurrence even as the rate of protein structure determination increases. This rarity reinforces the concept of folds as reusable units of structure and function shared by diverse proteins. If the folding mechanism of proteins is largely determined by their topology, then the folding pathways of members of existing folds could encompass the full set used by globular protein domains.

resultsWe have used recent versions of three common protein domain dictionaries (SCOP, CATH and Dali) to generate a consensus domain dictionary (CDD). Surprisingly, 40% of the metafolds in the CDD are not composed of autonomous structural domains, i.e. they are not plausible independent folding units. This finding has serious ramifications for bioinformatics studies mining these domain dictionaries for globular protein properties. However, our main purpose in deriving this CDD was to generate an updated CDD to choose targets for MD simulation as part of our dynameomics effort, which aims to simulate the native and unfolding pathways of representatives of all globular protein consensus folds (metafolds). Consequently, we also compiled a list of representative protein targets of each metafold in the CDD. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This domain dictionary is available at www.dynameomics.org.

Indexed as

Dictionaries as TopicProtein Structure, TertiaryComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein Folding

Identifiers

PMID21068000
PMCPMC3008646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.