Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21067708›Full record

ReviewActa psychologica2011

A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies.

Anne Pier Salverda, Meredith Brown, Michael K Tanenhaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta psychologica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decoupling speech processing from time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. See what I mean? Reading visual verbs modulates ocular dynamics.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Eye-Movement Suppression in the Visual World Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne Pier SalverdaUniversity of Rochester, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Rochester, NY 14627, United States. asalverda@bcs.rochester.edu
Meredith Brown
Michael K Tanenhaus

Funding

COORDINATING INFORMATION IN SENTENCE PROCESSINGR01HD027206 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 1991 to 2014
$4.0M
Time course of spoken word recognitionR01DC005071 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 2001 to 2011
$2.3M
Time Course of Spoken Word RecognitionR01HD073890 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 2012 to 2015
$989k
NICHD NIH HHS HD27206NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD027206NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073890NIDCD NIH HHS DC0005071NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an emerging literature on visual search in natural tasks suggesting that task-relevant goals account for a remarkably high proportion of saccades, including anticipatory eye movements. Moreover, factors such as "visual saliency" that otherwise affect fixations become less important when they are bound to objects that are not relevant to the task at hand. We briefly review this literature and discuss the implications for task-based variants of the visual world paradigm. We argue that the results and their likely interpretation may profoundly affect the "linking hypothesis" between language processing and the location and timing of fixations in task-based visual world studies. We outline a goal-based linking hypothesis and discuss some of the implications for how we conduct visual world studies, including how we interpret and analyze the data. Finally, we outline some avenues of research, including examples of some classes of experiments that might prove fruitful for evaluating the effects of goals in visual world experiments and the viability of a goal-based linking hypothesis.

Indexed as

GoalsLanguageAttentionEye MovementsHumansVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID21067708
PMCPMC3109199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.