ReviewCritical care (London, England)2010
Clinical review: mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in predicting preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Effects of mechanical ventilation with expiratory negative airway pressure on porcine pulmonary and systemic circulation: mechano-physiology and potential application.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2021Article
- Temporary surgical ventricular assist device for treatment of acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock in the percutaneous device era.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2021Article
- Benefit of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation before Revascularization in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Profound Cardiogenic Shock after Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest.Korean circulation journal · 2021Article
- Clinical application of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Mechanical circulatory support in the new era: an overview.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Review
- Percutaneous assist devices in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: Review, meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2016Article
- Percutaneous Mechanical Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Review.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2015Review
- Clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe refractory cardiogenic shock assisted with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.Yonsei medical journal · 2014Article
- Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Review
- Clinical impact of intra-aortic balloon pump during extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.BMC anesthesiology · 2014Article
- Percutaneous circulatory support in a patient with cardiac arrest due to acute pulmonary embolism.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012Article
- Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era.Intensive care medicine · 2012Review
- Perioperative mechanical circulatory support in children with critical heart disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2011Article
- Impact of concomitant respiratory infections in the management and outcomes acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.Indian heart journalArticle
- Percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a single centre experience.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction is one of the 10 leading reasons for admission to adult critical care units. In-hospital mortality for this condition has remained static in recent years, and this is related primarily to the development of cardiogenic shock. Recent advances in reperfusion therapies have had little impact on the mortality of cardiogenic shock. This may be attributable to the underutilization of life support technology that may assist or completely supplant the patient's own cardiac output until adequate myocardial recovery is established or long-term therapy can be initiated. Clinicians working in the intensive care environment are increasingly likely to be exposed to these technologies. The purpose of this review is to outline the various techniques of mechanical circulatory support and discuss the latest evidence for their use in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.