ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2010
[Biologics during pregnancy and breast--feeding].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- [IL-1-blockade with Anakinra during pregnancy : Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in female patients with familial Mediterranean fever].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2018Article
- Core set of recommendations for patients with ankylosing spondylitis concerning behaviour and environmental adaptations.Rheumatology international · 2013Article
- [Pregnancy and inflammatory rheumatic diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2013Article
- [Rheumatic diseases during pregnancy].Der Internist · 2012Article
- Rheumatoid arthritis and pregnancy: evolution of disease activity and pathophysiological considerations for drug use.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past years, biological therapies, especially anti-TNF-α antibody therapy has emerged as a treatment approach in patients who have failed to achieve or maintain remission with tradional DMARDs. Women suffering from inflammatory arthritis may need to continue therapy throughout pregnancy and/or in the lactation period, hence the increased concern over the safety of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy. Anti-TNF agents fall within the US FDA category B concerning fetal risk, indicating that no adequate and well-controlled studies have been conducted in pregnant or lactating women. However, in the last decade, numerous case series and registry data of pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF therapy have accumulated in the literature. According to these data, TNF inhibitor therapies appear to be safe in pregnancy, since no increased risk of malformations has been demonstrated. Ceasing therapy after conception should be considered, but treatment may be continued during pregnancy when indicated.The use of these agents is likely compatible with breast-feeding. The extent of fetal risk is not clarified for exposure to other biologics, such as Rituximab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.