Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21063493›Full record

ArticleCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2010

Posterior knee pain.

S English, D Perret

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Anatomical variations of the equine popliteal tendon.Journal of veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  4. Short-Term Outcome of Multi-Ligament Knee Injury among Sudanese Patients.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Angiomyomatous hamartoma of popliteal lymph node: an unusual entity.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2015
    Article
  7. A Baker's dozen.BMJ case reports · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S EnglishDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, The University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA USA. senglish@uci.edu
D Perret
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posterior knee pain is a common patient complaint. There are broad differential diagnoses of posterior knee pain ranging from common causes such as injury to the musculotendinous structures to less common causes such as osteochondroma. A precise understanding of knee anatomy, the physical examination, and of the differential diagnosis is needed to accurately evaluate and treat posterior knee pain. This article provides a review of the anatomy and important aspects of the history and physical examination when evaluating posterior knee pain. It concludes by discussing the causes and management of posterior knee pain.

Indexed as

KneePainPoplitealPosterior

Identifiers

PMID21063493
PMCPMC2941578
OpenAlexW1977399824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.