Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21063415›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2010

An immunohistochemically positive E-cadherin status is not always predictive for a good prognosis in human breast cancer.

P Querzoli, D Coradini, M Pedriali, P Boracchi, F Ambrogi, E Raimondi, R La Sorda, R Lattanzio, R Rinaldi, M Lunardi and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. E-cadherin expression promotes tumor growth via KLRG1-dependent pathways.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cadherin Signaling in Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The functional activity of E-cadherin controls tumor cell metastasis at multiple steps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic discovery strategies.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P QuerzoliSection of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy.
D Coradini
M Pedriali
P Boracchi
F Ambrogi
E Raimondi
R La Sorda
R Lattanzio
R Rinaldi
M Lunardi
C Frasson
F Modesti
S Ferretti
M Piantelli
S Iacobelli
E Biganzoli
I Nenci
S Alberti
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundin primary breast cancers dichotomic classification of E-cadherin expression, according to an arbitrary cutoff, may be inadequate and lead to loss of prognostic significance or contrasting prognostic indications. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of high and low E-cadherin levels in a consecutive case series (204 cases) of unilateral node-negative non-lobular breast cancer patients with a 8-year median follow-up and that did not receive any adjuvant therapy after surgery.

methodsexpression of E-cadherin was investigated by immunohistochemistry and assessed according to conventional score (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). Multiple correspondence analysis was used to visualise associations of both categorical and continuous variables. The impact of E-cadherin expression on patients outcome was evaluated in terms of event-free survival curves by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazard Cox model.

resultsrespect to intermediate E-cadherin expression values (2+), high (3+) or low (0 to 1+) E-cadherin expression levels had a negative prognostic impact. In fact, both patients with a low-to-nil (score 0 to 1+) expression level of E-cadherin and patients with a high E-cadherin expression level (score 3+) demonstrated an increased risk of failure (respectively, hazard ratio (HR)=1.71, confidence interval (CI)=0.72-4.06 and HR=4.22, CI=1.406-12.66) and an interesting association with young age.

conclusionsthe findings support the evidence that high expression values of E-cadherin are not predictive for a good prognosis and may help to explain conflicting evidence on the prognostic impact of E-cadherin in breast cancer when assessed on dichotomic basis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPrognosisCadherins

Identifiers

PMID21063415
PMCPMC3008612
OpenAlexW2036793602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.