Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21062962›Full record

ReviewGenetics2010

One hundred years of pleiotropy: a retrospective.

Frank W Stearns

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 243 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
243citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

243 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 533 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interaction between mutation type and gene pleiotropy drives parallel evolution in the laboratory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Association between tooth agenesis and cancer: a systematic review.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Superior haplotypes for transforming crop breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-wide association study identifies significant SNPs for milk production and stature traits in Karan Fries cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

183 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank W StearnsDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA. fstearns@umd.edu
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleiotropy is defined as the phenomenon in which a single locus affects two or more distinct phenotypic traits. The term was formally introduced into the literature by the German geneticist Ludwig Plate in 1910, 100 years ago. Pleiotropy has had an important influence on the fields of physiological and medical genetics as well as on evolutionary biology. Different approaches to the study of pleiotropy have led to incongruence in the way that it is perceived and discussed among researchers in these fields. Furthermore, our understanding of the term has changed quite a bit since 1910, particularly in light of modern molecular data. This review traces the history of the term "pleiotropy" and reevaluates its current place in the field of genetics.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsGeneticsHistory, 20th Century

Identifiers

PMID21062962
PMCPMC2975297
OpenAlexW2077646289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.