Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21062762›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Inverse perturbation for optimal intervention in gene regulatory networks.

Nidhal Bouaynaya, Roman Shterenberg, Dan Schonfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [State regulation for complex biological networks based on dynamic optimization algorithms].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimal Perturbation Control of General Topology Molecular Networks.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Robustness of inverse perturbation for discrete event control.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nidhal BouaynayaDepartment of Systems Engineering, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA. nxbouaynaya@ualr.edu
Roman Shterenberg
Dan Schonfeld

Funding

Mimimal-Perturbation Dynamic Control of the Melanoma Gene Regulatory NetworkR01GM096191 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SCHONFELD, DAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096191NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM096191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAnalysis and intervention in the dynamics of gene regulatory networks is at the heart of emerging efforts in the development of modern treatment of numerous ailments including cancer. The ultimate goal is to develop methods to intervene in the function of living organisms in order to drive cells away from a malignant state into a benign form. A serious limitation of much of the previous work in cancer network analysis is the use of external control, which requires intervention at each time step, for an indefinite time interval. This is in sharp contrast to the proposed approach, which relies on the solution of an inverse perturbation problem to introduce a one-time intervention in the structure of regulatory networks. This isolated intervention transforms the steady-state distribution of the dynamic system to the desired steady-state distribution.

resultsWe formulate the optimal intervention problem in gene regulatory networks as a minimal perturbation of the network in order to force it to converge to a desired steady-state distribution of gene regulation. We cast optimal intervention in gene regulation as a convex optimization problem, thus providing a globally optimal solution which can be efficiently computed using standard toolboxes for convex optimization. The criteria adopted for optimality is chosen to minimize potential adverse effects as a consequence of the intervention strategy. We consider a perturbation that minimizes (i) the overall energy of change between the original and controlled networks and (ii) the time needed to reach the desired steady-state distribution of gene regulation. Furthermore, we show that there is an inherent trade-off between minimizing the energy of the perturbation and the convergence rate to the desired distribution. We apply the proposed control to the human melanoma gene regulatory network. AVAILABILITY: The MATLAB code for optimal intervention in gene regulatory networks can be found online: http://syen.ualr.edu/nxbouaynaya/Bioinformatics2010.html.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGene Expression RegulationHumansMarkov ChainsMelanomaModels, StatisticalStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID21062762
PMCPMC3008638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.