Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21062548›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Integrating preconception care for women with diabetes into primary care: a qualitative study.

Iman Mortagy, Karina Kielmann, Stephanie E Baldeweg, Jo Modder, Mary B Pierce

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Attendance at pre-pregnancy care clinics for women with type 1 diabetes: A scoping review.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diabetes services and care provision.Journal of nephropharmacology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GP commissioning: the first year.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Jumping (or being pushed) from maternity care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Iman MortagyCentre for Maternal and Child Enquiries, Research and Development, London. iman.mortagy@cmace.org.uk
Karina Kielmann
Stephanie E Baldeweg
Jo Modder
Mary B Pierce
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMedical Research Council · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines emphasise the need to deliver preconception care to women of childbearing age. However, uptake of the services among women with diabetes in the UK is low. Questions arising include how best to deliver preconception care and what the respective roles of primary versus secondary caregivers might be.

aimTo explore the perspective of GPs and secondary care health professionals on the role of GPs in delivering preconception care to women with diabetes. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative, cross-sectional study.

settingA London teaching hospital and GP practices in the hospital catchment area.

methodSemi-structured interviews with GPs and members of the preconception care team in secondary care. Thematic analysis using the framework approach.

resultsGPs and secondary care professionals differ in their perception of the number of women with diabetes requiring preconception care and the extent to which preconception care should be integrated into GPs' roles. Health professionals agreed that GPs have a significant role to play and that delivery of preconception care is best shared between primary and secondary care. However, the lack of clear guidelines and shared protocols detailing the GP's role presents a challenge to implementing 'shared' preconception care.

conclusionGPs should be more effectively involved in providing preconception care to women with diabetes. Organisational and policy developments are required to support GPs in playing a role in preconception care. This study's findings stress the importance of providing an integrated approach to ensure continuity of care and optimal pregnancy preparation for women with diabetes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGeneral PracticeHumansPatient Education as TopicPhysician's RolePreconception Care

Identifiers

PMID21062548
PMCPMC2965966
OpenAlexW2146180320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.