Management of postnatal depression in primary care: a window of opportunity.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Challenges in diagnosing and treating postpartum depression in the primary care Setting- a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025
   Article
2. Japanese primary care physicians' postpartum mental health care: A cross-sectional study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024
   Article
3. Effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy in comparison to other psychological and pharmacological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in women diagnosed with postpartum depression in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024
   Review
4. Prevalence and determinants of poor sleep quality and depression among postpartum women: a community-based study in Ramechhap district, Nepal.International health · 2020
   Article
5. Family physicians perceived role in perinatal mental health: an integrative review.BMC family practice · 2018
   Review
6. Use of primary health care prior to a postpartum psychiatric episode.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2015
   Article
7. Jumping (or being pushed) from maternity care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as