Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21061131›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011

Influence of mesh type on the quality of early outcomes after inguinal hernia repair in ambulatory setting controlled study: Glucamesh® vs Polypropylene®.

Adriana Torcivia, Corinne Vons, Christophe Barrat, Fanny Dufour, Gerard Champault

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Meta-analyses of lightweight versus conventional (heavy weight) mesh in inguinal hernia surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana TorciviaCHU Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 juillet, Bondy, Paris 93140, France. adriana.torcivia@jvr.aphp.fr
Corinne Vons
Christophe Barrat
Fanny Dufour
Gerard Champault
Hôpital Jean-Verdier · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly post-operative pain after inguinal hernia repair delays management in ambulatory setting. The type of mesh used for repair appears to influence their incidence.

aimsThe aim of this randomized, prospective study using the alternation principle was to compare post-operative early pain and the quality of life of patients operated on for inguinal hernia depending on the type of mesh used and their impact on management in ambulatory setting. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifty successive patients were included prospectively. Hernia repair was performed using the Lichtenstein procedure with two types of mesh, namely standard polypropylene 100 g/m² (Prolène®) or light polypropylene (55 g/m²) with a natural beta-D-glucan coating (Glucamesh®). The main assessment criterion was post-operative pain evaluated twice daily by the patient for 7 days, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and their use of analgesics. The secondary assessment criteria were the rate of unscheduled admissions the evening of the intervention and the hospital length of stay and the quality of life evaluated by the SF12 questionnaire at pre-operative stage and on days 7 and 30.

resultsThe two groups were comparable. The operative durations were identical (38.8±10.2 vs 48±15.4 min). On the evening of the intervention before discharge, the pain was less intense in the Glucamesh® group (mean VAS score 21.6±2.4 vs 31.7±6.2, p=0.02). On day 4, 20% of patients from the Glucamesh® group and none of the patients from the Prolène® group had a VAS score of 0 (p=0.02). There were no unscheduled admissions in either group, but the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Glucamesh® group compared with the Prolène® group (288±35 vs 360±48 min, p=0.02). The post-operative quality of life evaluated by the SF12 questionnaire from day 7 to day 30 was the same in both groups (38±4.8 vs 37±5.2) and altered as at pre-operative stage compared with a control population (normal=50).

conclusionsThis randomized, prospective study showed that the use of a self-adhesive, light mesh, reducing the fixation sutures and coated with factors favouring tissue integration, such as the Glucamesh® prosthesis, significantly reduced early post-operative pain compared with conventional prostheses and could increase the percentage of patients likely to undergo an ambulatory hernia repair.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurgical MeshAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical Proceduresbeta-GlucansBiocompatible MaterialsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleFemaleHernia, InguinalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain Measurementbeta-GlucansBiocompatible MaterialsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID21061131
OpenAlexW1982335242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.