Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011
Influence of mesh type on the quality of early outcomes after inguinal hernia repair in ambulatory setting controlled study: Glucamesh® vs Polypropylene®.
Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Glue versus suture fixation of mesh during open repair of inguinal hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2013Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2012Pooled it
- Hybrid Surgical Hot Clinic (HSHC): Evaluation of Surgical Hot Clinic Services during COVID-19 Lockdown.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Design Strategies and Applications of Biomaterials and Devices for Hernia Repair.Bioactive materials · 2016Article
- A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015Review
- Meta-analyses of lightweight versus conventional (heavy weight) mesh in inguinal hernia surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly post-operative pain after inguinal hernia repair delays management in ambulatory setting. The type of mesh used for repair appears to influence their incidence.
aimsThe aim of this randomized, prospective study using the alternation principle was to compare post-operative early pain and the quality of life of patients operated on for inguinal hernia depending on the type of mesh used and their impact on management in ambulatory setting. PATIENTS AND
methodsFifty successive patients were included prospectively. Hernia repair was performed using the Lichtenstein procedure with two types of mesh, namely standard polypropylene 100 g/m² (Prolène®) or light polypropylene (55 g/m²) with a natural beta-D-glucan coating (Glucamesh®). The main assessment criterion was post-operative pain evaluated twice daily by the patient for 7 days, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and their use of analgesics. The secondary assessment criteria were the rate of unscheduled admissions the evening of the intervention and the hospital length of stay and the quality of life evaluated by the SF12 questionnaire at pre-operative stage and on days 7 and 30.
resultsThe two groups were comparable. The operative durations were identical (38.8±10.2 vs 48±15.4 min). On the evening of the intervention before discharge, the pain was less intense in the Glucamesh® group (mean VAS score 21.6±2.4 vs 31.7±6.2, p=0.02). On day 4, 20% of patients from the Glucamesh® group and none of the patients from the Prolène® group had a VAS score of 0 (p=0.02). There were no unscheduled admissions in either group, but the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Glucamesh® group compared with the Prolène® group (288±35 vs 360±48 min, p=0.02). The post-operative quality of life evaluated by the SF12 questionnaire from day 7 to day 30 was the same in both groups (38±4.8 vs 37±5.2) and altered as at pre-operative stage compared with a control population (normal=50).
conclusionsThis randomized, prospective study showed that the use of a self-adhesive, light mesh, reducing the fixation sutures and coated with factors favouring tissue integration, such as the Glucamesh® prosthesis, significantly reduced early post-operative pain compared with conventional prostheses and could increase the percentage of patients likely to undergo an ambulatory hernia repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.