Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21061099›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2011

Is testing for antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies clinically useful?

Marielle Sanmarco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marielle SanmarcoLaboratoire d'Immunologie, Hôpital de La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, Marseille 13385, France. msanmarco@ap-hm.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most intriguing characteristics of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is that diagnosis requires the combined presence of clinical abnormalities (thrombosis and/or miscarriages) and at least one of the following antiphospholipid antibodies: lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, or anti–β2-glycoprotein I. Clinicians occasionally have difficulty making this diagnosis in patients with a clinical picture of APS but without any of the previously mentioned antiphospholipid antibodies. Such a status has been defined as "seronegative APS." Under these conditions, antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies deserve particular attention, as they have been described as being associated with the main clinical events of APS. Thus, this review focuses on issues related to the characteristics of antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies, including the nature of antigen targets and their role in homeostasis, the methodologic problems encountered in their detection, and their clinical associations.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeHumansPhosphatidylethanolaminesAntibodies, AntiphospholipidphosphatidylethanolaminePhosphatidylethanolamines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.