Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21061084›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2011

Primary care providers’ judgments of opioid analgesic misuse in a community-based cohort of HIV-infected indigent adults.

Maya Vijayaraghavan, Joanne Penko, David Guzman, Christine Miaskowski, Margot B Kushel

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2017 HIVMA of IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients Living With HIV.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of pain with comorbid substance abuse.Current psychiatry reports · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maya VijayaraghavanDivision of General Internal Medicine/San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA 94143-1364, USA.
Joanne Penko
David Guzman
Christine Miaskowski
Margot B Kushel
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
TB PREVENTION AND HIV IN THE HOMELESS--AN INTERVENTIONR01MH054907 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BANGSBERG, DAVID ROY · 1995 to 2014
$20.7M
Pain and Misuse of Prescription Opioids in a Community-Based HIV-Infected CohortR01DA022550 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KUSHEL, MARGOT B · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022550NIDA NIH HHS R01DA022550NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH054907NIMH NIH HHS R01MH54907PHS HHS D55HP05165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers (PCPs) must balance treatment of chronic non-cancer pain with opioid analgesics with concerns about opioid misuse.

objectiveWe co-enrolled community-based indigent adults and their PCPs to determine PCPs’ accuracy of estimating opioid analgesic misuse and illicit substance use.

designPatient-provider dyad study.

participantsHIV-infected, community-based indigent adults (‘patients’) and their PCPs. MAIN MEASURES: Using structured interviews, we queried patients on use and misuse of opioid analgesics and illicit substances. PCPs completed patient- and provider-specific questionnaires. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and measures of agreement between PCPs’ judgments and patients’ reports of opioid misuse and illicit substance use. We examined factors associated with PCPs’ thinking that their patients had misused opioid analgesics and determined factors associated with patients’ misuse. KEY

resultsWe had 105 patient-provider dyads. Of the patients, 21 had misused opioids and 45 had used illicit substances in the past year. The sensitivity of PCPs’ judgments of opioid analgesic misuse was 61.9% and specificity, 53.6% (Kappa score 0.09, p = 0.10). The sensitivity of PCPs’ judgments of illicit substance use was 71.1% and specificity, 66.7% (Kappa score 0.37, p <0.001). PCPs were more likely to think that younger patients (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.97), African American patients (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.05-6.07) and those who had used illicit substances in the past year (AOR 3.33, 95% CI 1.35-8.20) had misused opioids. Younger (AOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.02) and African American (AOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.25-1.97) patients were not more likely to report misuse, whereas persons who had used illicit substances were (AOR 3.01, 95% CI 1.04-8.76).

conclusionPCPs’ impressions of misuse were discordant with patients’ self-reports of opioid analgesic misuse. PCPs incorrectly used age and race as predictors of misuse in this high-risk cohort.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsUncompensated CareAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansJudgmentLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareSelf ReportAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID21061084
PMCPMC3055969
OpenAlexW2047180198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.