Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21060968›Full record

ReviewThe review of diabetic studies : RDS2010

The new generation of beta-cells: replication, stem cell differentiation, and the role of small molecules.

Malgorzata Borowiak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The review of diabetic studies : RDS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling the blood-brain barrier using stem cell sources.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malgorzata BorowiakHarvard Stem Cell Institute and Department of Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology, 42 Church St, Cambridge, 02138, MA, USA. mborowiak@mcb.harvard.edu
Harvard Stem Cell Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic patients suffer from the loss of insulin-secreting β-cells, or from an improper working β-cell mass. Due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes across the world, there is a compelling need for a renewable source of cells that could replace pancreatic β-cells. In recent years, several promising approaches to the generation of new β-cells have been developed. These include directed differentiation of pluripotent cells such as embryonic stem (ES) cells or induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, or reprogramming of mature tissue cells. High yield methods to differentiate cell populations into β-cells, definitive endoderm, and pancreatic progenitors, have been established using growth factors and small molecules. However, the final step of directed differentiation to generate functional, mature β-cells in sufficient quantities has yet to be achieved in vitro. Beside the needs of transplantation medicine, a renewable source of β-cells would also be important in terms of a platform to study the pathogenesis of diabetes, and to seek alternative treatments. Finally, by generating new β-cells, we could learn more details about pancreatic development and β-cell specification. This review gives an overview of pancreas ontogenesis in the perspective of stem cell differentiation, and highlights the critical aspects of small molecules in the generation of a renewable β-cell source. Also, it discusses longer term challenges and opportunities in moving towards a therapeutic goal for diabetes.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansInsulin-Secreting CellsPancreasPancreatic HormonesStem CellsTranscription FactorsPancreatic HormonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21060968
PMCPMC2989782
OpenAlexW1575217353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.