Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21060842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Analysis of chaperone mRNA expression in the adult mouse brain by meta analysis of the Allen Brain Atlas.

Andrew T N Tebbenkamp, David R Borchelt

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HSF1 and Its Role in Huntington's Disease Pathology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease.Annual review of biochemistry · 2015
    Review
  13. Targeting Hsp90 and its co-chaperones to treat Alzheimer's disease.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2014
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew T N TebbenkampDepartment of Neuroscience, SantaFe Health Alzheimer's Disease Center, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. atebbenk@ufl.edu
David R Borchelt
University of Florida · US

Funding

Protein Misfolding in NeurodegenerationR01NS044278 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BORCHELT, DAVID R · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathology of many neurodegenerative diseases is characterized by the accumulation of misfolded and aggregated proteins in various cell types and regional substructures throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. The accumulation of these aggregated proteins signals dysfunction of cellular protein homeostatic mechanisms such as the ubiquitin/proteasome system, autophagy, and the chaperone network. Although there are several published studies in which transcriptional profiling has been used to examine gene expression in various tissues, including tissues of neurodegenerative disease models, there has not been a report that focuses exclusively on expression of the chaperone network. In the present study, we used the Allen Brain Atlas online database to analyze chaperone expression levels. This database utilizes a quantitative in situ hybridization approach and provides data on 270 chaperone genes within many substructures of the adult mouse brain. We determined that 256 of these chaperone genes are expressed at some level. Surprisingly, relatively few genes, only 30, showed significant variations in levels of mRNA across different substructures of the brain. The greatest degree of variability was exhibited by genes of the DnaJ co-chaperone, Tetratricopeptide repeat, and the HSPH families. Our analysis provides a valuable resource towards determining how variations in chaperone gene expression may modulate the vulnerability of specific neuronal populations of mammalian brain.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicAnimalsBrainGene Expression ProfilingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular ChaperonesRNA, MessengerSubcellular FractionsMolecular ChaperonesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21060842
PMCPMC2965669
OpenAlexW1977496718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.