Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21060717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2010

Cholinergic and non-cholinergic projections from the pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei to the medial geniculate body in Guinea pigs.

Susan D Motts, Brett R Schofield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Neural Correlates of Perceptual Plasticity in the Auditory Midbrain and Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Auditory thalamic circuits and GABAHearing research · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. MC4R expression in pedunculopontine nucleus involved in the modulation of midbrain dopamine system.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Laterodorsal tegmentum and pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus circuits regulate renal functions: Neuroanatomical evidence in mice models.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan D MottsDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy Rootstown, OH, USA.
Brett R Schofield
Kent State University · US

Funding

Modulatory Circuits in the Auditory SystemR01DC004391 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI SCHOFIELD, BRETT R · 1999 to 2025
$9.9M
Cholinergic Circuitry in Auditory BrainstemF31DC008463 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MOTTS, SUSAN DIANE · 2007 to 2009
$75k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008463NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The midbrain tegmentum is the source of cholinergic innervation of the thalamus and has been associated with arousal and control of the sleep/wake cycle. In general, the innervation arises bilaterally from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) and the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDT). While this pattern has been observed for many thalamic nuclei, a projection from the LDT to the medial geniculate body (MG) has been questioned in some species. We combined retrograde tracing with immunohistochemistry for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) to identify cholinergic projections from the brainstem to the MG in guinea pigs. Double-labeled cells (retrograde and immunoreactive for ChAT) were found in both the PPT (74%) and the LDT (26%). In both nuclei, double-labeled cells were more numerous on the ipsilateral side. About half of the retrogradely labeled cells were immunonegative, suggesting they are non-cholinergic. The distribution of these immunonegative cells was similar to that of the immunopositive ones: more were in the PPT than the LDT and more were on the ipsilateral than the contralateral side. The results indicate that both the PPT and the LDT project to the MG, and suggest that both cholinergic and non-cholinergic cells contribute substantially to these projections.

Indexed as

acetylcholinearousalauditoryGABAglutamatesleepthalamus

Identifiers

PMID21060717
PMCPMC2972721
OpenAlexW1997835406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.