ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2011
Urinary aldosterone excretion and electrolytic balance in response to chronic diuretic therapy in very low-birth weight infants.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been reported that the reninangiotensin- aldosterone system of healthy newborn infants and pre-term infants responds to acute furosemide challenge.
objectiveTo assess urinary aldosterone excretion (UAE) and electrolytic balance in very low-birth weight (VLBW) infants who received chronic therapy with furosemide and to compare them with those of infants who did not receive diuretic therapy.
methodsInfants with birth weight <1500 g were considered eligible for this prospective observational study. On the 10th day of life, infants enrolled were divided in 2 groups on the basis of our predictive score for chronic lung disease (CLD): group 1, with positive score, received furosemide and group 2, with negative score, did not receive diuretic therapy. Urinary aldosterone and electrolytes excretion, electrolytes intakes and clearance of creatinine were investigated before the beginning of the treatment and then weekly until discharge in both groups, and results were compared.
resultsThirty infants were studied: 15 received long-term furosemide and 15 did not. UAE progressively increased in infants who received furosemide whereas remained unchanged in infants who did not receive treatment. UAE was greater in group 1 than in group 2 after 3 weeks of diuretic treatment, reaching statistical significance after 4 weeks of treatment.
conclusionsIn VLBW infants, chronic therapy with furosemide leads to a progressive increase in UAE that may potentially limit the diuretic effect of long-term use of furosemide in the management of CLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.