Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21060110›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2011

A lifespan analysis of intraneocortical connections and gene expression in the mouse I.

Catherine A Dye, Hani El Shawa, Kelly J Huffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transgenerational Effects of Prenatal Ethanol Exposure in Prepubescent Mice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cited2 Regulates Neocortical Layer II/III Generation and Somatosensory Callosal Projection Neuron Development and Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Prenatal ethanol exposure disrupts intraneocortical circuitry, cortical gene expression, and behavior in a mouse model of FASD.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine A DyeDepartment of Psychology and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, University of California-Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Hani El Shawa
Kelly J Huffman

Funding

Neocortical regionalization: Analysis of genetic and epigenetic influencesR03MH080502 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI HUFFMAN, KELLY · 2008 to 2009
$150k
NIMH NIH HHS 5R03MH080502-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of mammalian evolution is the structural and functional complexity of the cerebral cortex. Within the cerebral cortex, the neocortex, or isocortex, is a 6-layered complexly organized structure that is comprised of multiple interconnected sensory and motor areas. These areas and their precise patterns of connections arise during development, through a process termed arealization. Intrinsic, activity-independent and extrinsic, activity-dependent mechanisms are involved in the development of neocortical areas and their connections. The intrinsic molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of this sophisticated network are not fully understood. In this report (I) and the companion report (II), we present the first lifespan analysis of ipsilateral intraneocortical connections (INCs) among multiple sensory and motor regions, from the embryonic period to adulthood in the mouse. Additionally, we characterize the neocortical expression patterns of several developmentally regulated genes that are of central importance to studies investigating the molecular control of arealization from embryonic day 13.5 to postnatal day (P) 3 (I) and P6 to 50 (II). In this analysis, we utilize novel methods to correlate the boundaries of gene expression with INCs and developing areal boundaries, in order to better understand the nature of gene-areal relationships during development.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAmino AcidsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrain MappingCadherinsCerebral CortexCOUP Transcription FactorsEmbryo, MammalianEphrin-A5FemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeodomain ProteinsInhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2LIM-Homeodomain Proteins4-(4-dihexadecylaminostyryl)-N-methylpyridiumAmino AcidsCadherinsCdh8 protein, mouseCOUP Transcription FactorsdolaisoleucineEphrin-A5Homeodomain ProteinsIdb2 protein, mouseInhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2Lhx2 protein, mouseLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsNuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 2Pyridinium CompoundsReceptor, EphA7Rorb protein, mouseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21060110
PMCPMC3140180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.