ArticleDevelopmental psychology2010
The age prospective memory paradox: young adults may not give their best outside of the lab.
Article in Developmental psychology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategic reminder setting for time-based intentions: Influence of metacognition, delay length, and cue visibility.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- A naturalistic virtual reality task reveals difficulties in time-based prospective memory and strategic time-monitoring in children with ADHD.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reminders eliminate age-related declines in prospective memory.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Objective and Subjective Prospective Memory Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Observational
- The Effect of Time Monitoring on the Development of Time-Based Prospective Memory among Children Aged 7-11 Years Old.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The cost of monitoring in time-based prospective memory.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance.Cognition · 2023Article
- A descriptive study on misidentifications of a person as a familiar person in an everyday situation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Age differences in routine formation: the role of automatization, motivation, and executive functions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Understanding the Neural Basis of Prospective Memory Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- I could do it now, but I'd rather (forget to) do it later: examining links between procrastination and prospective memory failures.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Revisiting the Age-Prospective Memory Paradox Using Laboratory and Ecological Tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Redefining the pattern of age-prospective memory-paradox: new insights on age effects in lab-based, naturalistic, and self-assigned tasks.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Effects of Sleep and Age on Prospective Memory Consolidation: A Walk in a Virtual Museum.Clocks & sleep · 2019Article
- Absence of age effects on spontaneous past and future thinking in daily life.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Investigating the Potential Role of Ecological Validity on Change-Detection Memory Tasks and Distractor Processing in Younger and Older Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Age-related differences in the goals and concerns that motivate real-life prospective memory tasks.PloS one · 2019Article
- Is binding decline the main source of the ageing effect on prospective memory? A ride in a virtual town.Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology · 2017Article
- The effects of HIV disease and older age on laboratory-based, naturalistic, and self-perceived symptoms of prospective memory: does retrieval cue type and delay interval matter?Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2016Article
- Regularity effect in prospective memory during aging.Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has identified the age prospective memory paradox of age-related declines in laboratory settings in contrast to age benefits in naturalistic settings. Various factors are assumed to account for this paradox, yet empirical evidence on this issue is scarce. In 2 experiments, the present study examined the effect of task setting in a laboratory task and the effect of motivation in a naturalistic task on prospective memory performance in young and older adults. For the laboratory task (Experiment 1, n = 40), we used a board game to simulate a week of daily activities and varied features of the prospective memory task (e.g., task regularity). For the naturalistic task (Experiment 2, n = 80), we instructed participants to try to remember to contact the experimenter repeatedly over the course of 1 week. Results from the laboratory prospective memory tasks indicated significant age-related decline for irregular tasks (p = .006) but not for regular and focal tasks. In addition, in the naturalistic task, the age benefit was eliminated when young adults were motivated by incentives (F < 1). In conclusion, the present results indicate that the variability of age differences in laboratory prospective memory tasks may be due in part to differences in the features of the prospective memory task. Furthermore, increases in motivation to perform the prospective task seem to help remedy prospective memory deficits in young adults in the naturalistic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.