Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21057889›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2011

Three generations of matrilineal excess of birth defects in Irish families with neural tube defects.

J Byrne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J ByrneBoyne Research Institute, Duke House, Duke Street, Drogheda, Ireland. jbyrne@boyneresearch.ie
Boyne Research Institute · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural tube defects (NTDs) and birth defects overall are more likely to occur among maternal compared to paternal relatives in two generations (uncles/aunts and first cousins) of Irish families where an individual has been born with an NTD.

aimsThe aim of this study was to determine if the matrilineal excess persisted into the third generation.

methodsFirst cousins were interviewed about their pregnancy outcomes and their offsprings' health.

resultsMaternal first cousins once removed (FCOR) were more likely to have birth defects than paternal FCOR: 6.7 versus 3.5% (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95% CI 0.57, 3.89). No NTDs occurred. Folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of birth defects (P = 0.04).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates an excess of birth defects among maternal relatives in three consecutive generations of NTD families, and supports the hypothesis that an underlying mechanism links distant maternal relatives in at least some NTD families.

Indexed as

FamilyCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansMaleNeural Tube DefectsPregnancyPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21057889
OpenAlexW1971936856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.