Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21057850›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2011

Auditory cortex electrical stimulation suppresses tinnitus in rats.

Jinsheng Zhang, Yupeng Zhang, Xueguo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2014
    Review
  16. Animal models of subjective tinnitus.Neural plasticity · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinsheng ZhangLaboratory of Auditory Prostheses Research, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 Saint Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. jinzhang@med.wayne.edu
Yupeng Zhang
Xueguo Zhang

Funding

Cortical Electrical Suppression of Noise-Induced TinnitusR21DC010059 · NIDCD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JINSHENG · 2009 to 2010
$499k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC010059NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC010059-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that auditory cortex electrical stimulation (ACES) has yielded promising results in the suppression of patients' tinnitus. However, the large variability in the efficacy of ACES-induced suppression across individuals has hindered its development into a reliable therapy. Due to ethical reasons, many issues cannot be comprehensively addressed in patients. In order to search for effective stimulation targets and identify optimal stimulation strategies, we have developed the first rat model to test for the suppression of behavioral evidence of tone-induced tinnitus through ACES. Our behavioral results demonstrated that electrical stimulation of all channels (frequency bands) in the auditory cortex significantly suppressed behavioral evidence of tinnitus and enhanced hearing detection at the central level. Such suppression of tinnitus and enhancement of hearing detection were respectively demonstrated by a reversal of tone exposure compromised gap detection at 10-12, 14-16, and 26-28 kHz and compromised prepulse inhibition at 10-12 and 26-28 kHz. On the contrary, ACES did not induce behavioral changes in animals that did not manifest any behavioral evidence of tinnitus and compromised hearing detection following the same tone exposure. The results point out that tinnitus may be more related to compromised central auditory processing than hearing loss at the peripheral level. The ACES-induced suppression of behavioral evidence of tinnitus may involve restoration of abnormal central auditory processing.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyAnimalsAuditory CortexBehavior, AnimalElectrodesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMaleModels, AnimalRatsRats, Long-EvansTinnitusTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21057850
PMCPMC3046330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.