ArticleClinical rheumatology2011
Spinal mobility and its impact in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Construct validity of clinical spinal mobility tests in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2016Pooled it
- Associations Between Depression and Reduced Quality of Life in Women with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Spondyloarthritis in North Africa: an update.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- The impact of ankylosing spondylitis on female sexual functions.International journal of impotence research · 2013Article
- Relationship of the sexual functions with the clinical parameters, radiological scores and the quality of life in male patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Rheumatology international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess spinal mobility and its relationship with disease-related parameters of activity, severity, and quality of life in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). One hundred patients with AS according to New York Classification criteria were recruited. Chest expansion, Schober index, occiput-to-wall distance, and the combined index of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) were used to assess spinal mobility. Assessment criteria included the evaluation of disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity index), functional status (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), and radiographic damage (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiologic Index).The short form-36 (SF-36) generic instrument was used to assess health-related quality of life. The mean age of patients was 38 ± 13 years. There were 67% of males in our data. Our patients had moderate disease activity, severe functional disability, and important radiological damage. The mean value of occiput-to-wall distance was 4 ± 6.2 cm, chest expansion was 3.4 ± 1.2 cm, Schober index was 2.7 ± 1.2 cm, and BASMI was 4 ± 3. Impaired spinal mobility, corresponding to higher scores of BASMI, had good statistically significant correlations with prolonged disease duration, severe functional disability (BASFI), important radiological damage (BASRI) and with the deterioration of most domains of SF-36 (p < 0.001). In our study, we state that functional status and radiographic damage are the main factors associated with limited spinal mobility. Also, altered spinal measurements had a negative impact on physical function domain of quality of life. Recognizing relationships between spinal mobility measures and clinical and radiological measures in AS can help us to develop early therapeutic strategies to reduce loss of spinal mobility in Moroccan patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21057838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.