Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21057827›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2011

Macromolecules in phloem exudates--a review.

Craig A Atkins, Penny M C Smith, Caren Rodriguez-Medina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Root-to-Shoot Long-Distance Mobile miRNAs Identified fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The enemy within: phloem-limited pathogens.Molecular plant pathology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Small RNAs fromFrontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Craig A AtkinsSchool of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. craig.atkins@uwa.edu.au
Penny M C Smith
Caren Rodriguez-Medina

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses using the growing resources of genomic information have been applied to identification of macromolecules in exudates collected from phloem. Most of the analyses rely on collection of exudate following incisions made to the vasculature, but some limited data are available for exudates collected from excised aphid stylets. Species examined, to date, include a number of cereals (rice, barley, and wheat), a number of cucurbits, castor bean, members of the genus Lupinus, brassicas, and Arabidopsis. As many as 1,100 proteins, some hundreds of transcripts, and a growing number of small ribonucleic acids (RNAs), including micro-RNAs, have been identified across the species with a high degree of commonality. Questions relating to the nature and extent of contamination of sieve element contents with those of surrounding companion cells and nonvascular cells are addressed together with likely functions of identified macromolecules. The review considers likely translocation and systemic signaling functions among the macromolecular inventory of phloem exudates.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMicroRNAsPhloemPlant ProteinsProtein TransportRNA, PlantRNA, Small InterferingMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.