ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011
Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.
- PhosSight: A Unified Deep Learning Framework Boosting and Accelerating Phosphoproteome Identification to Enable Biological Discoveries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Precision Profiling of the Cardiovascular Post-Translationally Modified Proteome.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Nuclear rupture in confined cell migration triggers nuclear actin polymerization to limit chromatin leakage.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Poxvirus H5 mediates the formation of liquid-liquid phase separation condensates which promote virus factory assembly.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Finding coexisting combinations of posttranslational modifications with HomMTM spectra.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A Universal Spectrum Annotator for Complex Peptidoforms in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Leveraging HILIC/ERLIC separations for online nanoscale LC-MS/MS analysis of phosphopeptide isoforms from RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2025Article
- Advancements in Global Phosphoproteomics Profiling: Overcoming Challenges in Sensitivity and Quantification.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Fast and deep phosphoproteome analysis with the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Enhanced mapping of small-molecule binding sites in cells.Nature chemical biology · 2024Article
- Computational approaches to identify sites of phosphorylation.Proteomics · 2024Review
- Dynamic Protein Phosphorylation inMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Prediction Boosts Phosphoproteomics-Based Discoveries Through Improved Phosphopeptide Identification.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Article
- Article
- A Multipathway Phosphopeptide Standard for Rapid Phosphoproteomics Assay Development.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- Considerations for defining +80 Da mass shifts in mass spectrometry-based proteomics: phosphorylation and beyond.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Mzion enables deep and precise identification of peptides in data-dependent acquisition proteomics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- DeepFLR facilitates false localization rate control in phosphoproteomics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Principles of phosphoproteomics and applications in cancer research.The Biochemical journal · 2023Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large scale phosphorylation analysis is more and more getting into focus of proteomic research. Although it is now possible to identify thousands of phosphorylated peptides in a biological system, confident site localization remains challenging. Here we validate the Mascot Delta Score (MD-score) as a simple method that achieves similar sensitivity and specificity for phosphosite localization as the published Ascore, which is mainly used in conjunction with Sequest. The MD-score was evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem MS data of 180 individually synthesized phosphopeptides with precisely known phosphorylation sites. We tested the MD-score for a wide range of commonly available fragmentation methods and found it to be applicable throughout with high statistical significance. However, the different fragmentation techniques differ strongly in their ability to localize phosphorylation sites. At 1% false localization rate, the highest number of correctly assigned phosphopeptides was achieved by higher energy collision induced dissociation in combination with an Orbitrap mass analyzer followed very closely by low resolution ion trap spectra obtained after electron transfer dissociation. Both these methods are significantly better than low resolution spectra acquired after collision induced dissociation and multi stage activation. Score thresholds determined from simple calibration functions for each fragmentation method were stable over replicate analyses of the phosphopeptide set. The MD-score outperforms the Ascore for tyrosine phosphorylated peptides and we further show that the ability to call sites correctly increases with increasing distance of two candidate sites within a peptide sequence. The MD-score does not require complex computational steps which makes it attractive in terms of practical utility. We provide all mass spectra and the synthetic peptides to the community so that the development of present and future localization software can be benchmarked and any laboratory can determine MD-scores and localization probabilities for their individual analytical set up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.