Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21057111›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Two mechanisms of ion selectivity in protein binding sites.

Haibo Yu, Sergei Yu Noskov, Benoît Roux

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Architectural Forces in Ion Selectivity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The Molecular Mechanism of Ion Selectivity in Nanopores.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ion channel selectivity through ion-modulated changes of selectivity filter pProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stable potassium isotopes (Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Conductance selectivity of NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Many-body effect determines the selectivity for CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Ion channels and ion selectivity.Essays in biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  17. The Environment Shapes the Inner Vestibule of LeuT.PLoS computational biology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Haibo YuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Sergei Yu Noskov
Benoît Roux
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Computational Studies of Ion Channels - Resubmission 01R01GM062342 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ROUX, BENOIT · 2001 to 2022
$8.7M
CIHR 200804MOP-186232NIGMS NIH HHS GM-62342NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A theoretical framework is presented to clarify the molecular determinants of ion selectivity in protein binding sites. The relative free energy of a bound ion is expressed in terms of the main coordinating ligands coupled to an effective potential of mean force representing the influence of the rest of the protein. The latter is separated into two main contributions. The first includes all the forces keeping the ion and the coordinating ligands confined to a microscopic subvolume but does not prevent the ligands from adapting to a smaller or larger ion. The second regroups all the remaining forces that control the precise geometry of the coordinating ligands best adapted to a given ion. The theoretical framework makes it possible to delineate two important limiting cases. In the limit where the geometric forces are dominant (rigid binding site), ion selectivity is controlled by the ion-ligand interactions within the matching cavity size according to the familiar "snug-fit" mechanism of host-guest chemistry. In the limit where the geometric forces are negligible, the ion and ligands behave as a "confined microdroplet" that is free to fluctuate and adapt to ions of different sizes. In this case, ion selectivity is set by the interplay between ion-ligand and ligand-ligand interactions and is controlled by the number and the chemical type of ion-coordinating ligands. The framework is illustrated by considering the ion-selective binding sites in the KcsA channel and the LeuT transporter.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein BindingBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesIonsLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPlasma Membrane Neurotransmitter Transport ProteinsPotassium ChannelsBacterial ProteinsIonsLigandsPlasma Membrane Neurotransmitter Transport ProteinsPotassium Channelsprokaryotic potassium channel

Identifiers

PMID21057111
PMCPMC2996701
OpenAlexW2056488018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.