Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21056014›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2010

The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response.

Abdallah Al-Hakim, Cristina Escribano-Diaz, Marie-Claude Landry, Lara O'Donnell, Stephanie Panier, Rachel K Szilard, Daniel Durocher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Structural and functional validation of a highly specific Smurf2 inhibitor.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deubiquitinases in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023
    Review
  15. Toxics · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdallah Al-HakimSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X5, ON, Canada.
Cristina Escribano-Diaz
Marie-Claude Landry
Lara O'Donnell
Stephanie Panier
Rachel K Szilard
Daniel Durocher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein ubiquitylation has emerged as an important regulatory mechanism that impacts almost every aspect of the DNA damage response. In this review, we discuss how DNA repair and checkpoint pathways utilize the diversity offered by the ubiquitin conjugation system to modulate the response to genotoxic lesions in space and time. In particular, we will highlight recent work done on the regulation of DNA double-strand breaks signalling and repair by the RNF8/RNF168 E3 ubiquitin ligases, the Fanconi anemia pathway and the role of protein degradation in the enforcement and termination of checkpoint signalling. We also discuss the various functions of deubiquitylating enzymes in these processes along with potential avenues for exploiting the ubiquitin conjugation/deconjugation system for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsGenes, cdcProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSignal TransductionUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDNA-Binding ProteinsFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRNF168 protein, humanRNF8 protein, humanUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID21056014
PMCPMC7105183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.