ArticleBiophysical chemistry2010
Assessing the native state conformational distribution of ubiquitin by peptide acidity.
Article in Biophysical chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- TCR-pMHC: Envisioning the specialized dynamics of the target 5-component complex.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2022Article
- TCR-pMHC: may the force be of you?Cellular & molecular immunology · 2021Article
- Ensembles of a small number of conformations with relative populations.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
- Analysing the visible conformational substates of the FK506-binding protein FKBP12.The Biochemical journal · 2013Article
- Assessing the chemical accuracy of protein structures via peptide acidity.Biophysical chemistry · 2013Article
- Experimentally assessing molecular dynamics sampling of the protein native state conformational distribution.Biophysical chemistry · 2012Article
- Experimental free energy surfaces reveal the mechanisms of maintenance of protein solubility.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At equilibrium, every energetically feasible conformation of a protein occurs with a non-zero probability. Quantitative analysis of protein flexibility is thus synonymous with determining the proper Boltzmann-weighting of this conformational distribution. The exchange reactivity of solvent-exposed amide hydrogens greatly varies with conformation, while the short-lived peptide anion intermediate implies an insensitivity to the dynamics of conformational motion. Amides that are well-exposed in model conformational ensembles of ubiquitin vary a million-fold in exchange rates which continuum dielectric methods can predict with an rmsd of 3. However, the exchange rates for many of the more rarely exposed amides are markedly overestimated in the PDB-deposited 2K39 and 2KN5 ubiquitin ensembles, while the 2NR2 ensemble predictions are largely consistent with those of the Boltzmann-weighted conformational distribution sampled at the level of 1%. The correlation between the fraction of solvent-accessible conformations for a given amide hydrogen and the exchange rate constant for that residue provides a useful monitor of the degree of completeness with which a given ensemble has sampled the energetically accessible conformational space. These exchange predictions correlate with the degree to which each ensemble deviates from a set of 46 ubiquitin X-ray structures. Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis for the distribution of intra- and inter-ensemble pairwise structural rmsd values assisted the identification of a subensemble of 2K39 that eliminates the overestimations of hydrogen exchange rates observed for the full ensemble. The relative merits of incorporating experimental restraints into the conformational sampling process are compared to using these restraints as filters to select subpopulations consistent with the experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.