Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21054866›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2010

Cost analysis of centralized viral load testing for antiretroviral therapy monitoring in Nicaragua, a low-HIV prevalence, low-resource setting.

Jay Gerlach, Magda Sequeira, Vivian Alvarado, Christian Cerpas, Angel Balmaseda, Alcides Gonzalez, Tala de Los Santos, Carol E Levin, Juan Jose Amador, Gonzalo J Domingo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay Gerlach *Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Seattle, Washington 98121, USA.
Magda Sequeira *PATH, Managua, Nicaragua.
Vivian Alvarado *PATH, Managua, Nicaragua.
Christian CerpasCentro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Costado Oeste Colonia Primero de Mayo, Managua, Nicaragua.
Angel BalmasedaCentro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Costado Oeste Colonia Primero de Mayo, Managua, Nicaragua.
Alcides GonzalezCentro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Costado Oeste Colonia Primero de Mayo, Managua, Nicaragua.
Tala de Los SantosPrograms for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Seattle, Washington 98121, USA.
Carol E LevinPrograms for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Seattle, Washington 98121, USA.
Juan Jose AmadorPATH, Managua, Nicaragua.
Gonzalo J DomingoPrograms for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Seattle, Washington 98121, USA.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

TrainingU54EB007949 · NIBIB · PATH · PI TOTTEN, PATRICIA A · 2007 to 2011
$8.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54EB007949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV viral load testing as a component of antiretroviral therapy monitoring is costly. Understanding the full costs and the major sources of inefficiency associated with viral load testing is critical for optimizing the systems and technologies that support the testing process. The objective of our study was to estimate the costs associated with viral load testing performed for antiretroviral therapy monitoring to both patients and the public healthcare system in a low-HIV prevalence, low-resource country.

methodsA detailed cost analysis was performed to understand the costs involved in each step of performing a viral load test in Nicaragua, from initial specimen collection to communication of the test results to each patient's healthcare provider. Data were compiled and cross referenced from multiple information sources: laboratory records, regional surveillance centre records, and scheduled interviews with the key healthcare providers responsible for HIV patient care in five regions of the country.

resultsThe total average cost of performing a viral load test in Nicaragua varied by region, ranging from US$99.01 to US$124.58, the majority of which was at the laboratory level: $88.73 to $97.15 per specimen, depending on batch size. The average cost to clinics at which specimens were collected ranged from $3.31 to $20.92, depending on the region. The average cost per patient for transportation, food, lodging and lost income ranged from $3.70 to $14.93.

conclusionsThe quantitative viral load test remains the single most expensive component of the process. For the patient, the distance of his or her residence from the specimen collection site is a large determinant of cost. Importantly, the efficiency of results reporting has a large impact on the cost per result delivered to the clinician and utility of the result for patient monitoring. Detailed cost analysis can identify opportunities for removing barriers to effective antiretroviral therapy monitoring programmes in limited-resource countries with low HIV prevalence.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCost of IllnessCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug MonitoringHealth ResourcesHIV InfectionsHumansLaboratoriesNicaraguaPrevalenceViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID21054866
PMCPMC2992476
OpenAlexW2133968472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.