ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2010
Non-malignant drivers of elevated C-reactive protein levels differ in patients with and without a history of cancer.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social network ties and inflammation in U.S. adults with cancer.Biodemography and social biology · 2014Article
- Serum ferritin levels associated with increased risk for developing CHD in a low-income urban population.Public health nutrition · 2012Article
- Review of the relationship between C-reactive protein and exercise.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeElevations in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict metastasis and mortality in a number of malignancies. However, the impact of non-malignant factors on CRP levels in patients with cancer remains unknown. To address this issue, we conducted an investigation of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) cohort.
methodsNSHAP participants with a history of malignancy were included. The 222-participant cohort was subdivided by CRP levels into low-risk (CRP <3 mg/L) and high-risk (CRP ≥3 mg/L) groups. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses examined the impact of variables spanning social factors, demographic characteristics, and past medical history on high-risk CRP levels.
resultsOf the cohort, 42.3% exhibited high-risk CRP levels. These participants were more likely to be unmarried (p = 0.013), to be a racial/ethnic minority (p = 0.012), to not use HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) medications (p = 0.032), and to be obese (p = 0.002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, these variables were also significant predictors of high-risk CRP levels. For example, compared with participants who had a normal body mass index (BMI), obese participants were nearly 5 times more likely (odds ratio 5.725; 95% CI 1.848, 12.079; p = 0.001) to exhibit high-risk CRP levels.
conclusionsCRP remains an important prognostic biomarker in the management of known malignancies. However, patients with a known history of cancer can also exhibit elevated CRP levels due to non-malignant factors such as race and ethnicity, statin use, marital status, and BMI. Consequently, further studies are needed to assess the predictive potential of CRP levels for cancer prognostication in the face of these social and biologic variables before use of this biomarker is widely adopted in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.