Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21051345›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

FGDB: revisiting the genome annotation of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum.

Philip Wong, Mathias Walter, Wanseon Lee, Gertrud Mannhaupt, Martin Münsterkötter, Hans-Werner Mewes, Gerhard Adam, Ulrich Güldener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Different Hydrophobins ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  7. Biochemical Characterization of theFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philip WongHelmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Mathias Walter
Wanseon Lee
Gertrud Mannhaupt
Martin Münsterkötter
Hans-Werner Mewes
Gerhard Adam
Ulrich Güldener

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MIPS Fusarium graminearum Genome Database (FGDB) was established as a comprehensive genome database on one of the most devastating fungal plant pathogens of wheat, barley and maize. The current version of FGDB v3.1 provides information on the full manually revised gene set based on the Broad Institute assembly FG3 genome sequence. The results of gene prediction tools were integrated with the help of comparative data on related species to result in a set of 13.718 annotated protein coding genes. This rigorous approach involved adding or modifying gene models and represents a coding sequence gold standard for the genus Fusarium. The gene loci improvements results in 2461 genes which either are new or have different structures compared to the Broad Institute assembly 3 gene set. Moreover the database serves as a convenient entry point to explore expression data results and to obtain information on the Affymetrix GeneChip probe sets. The resource is accessible on http://mips.gsf.de/genre/proj/FGDB/.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticFungal ProteinsFusariumGene Expression ProfilingGenome, FungalMolecular Sequence AnnotationFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21051345
PMCPMC3013644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.