Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21051210›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2010

Peanut allergy and anaphylaxis.

Fred D Finkelman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Progress in genetic engineering and genome editing of peanuts: revealing the future of crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Blockade of peanut allergy with a novel Ara h 2-Fcγ fusion protein in mice.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2013
    Article
  18. [Food allergy in childhood].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fred D FinkelmanDepartment of Medicine, Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45220, United States. ffinkelman@pol.net
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Identification Of Proteins Responsible For Peanut AllergenicityR21AI079947 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI FINKELMAN, FRED DOUGLASS · 2008 to 2009
$429k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI079947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peanuts are a frequent cause of food allergy and the most common cause of fatal food-induced anaphylaxis in the U.S. Advances during the past two years have promoted our understanding of peanut allergens and peanut allergy prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. The advances highlighted in this review include evidence that the peanut allergens most important in disease differ in different parts of the world, that early oral exposure to peanuts may decrease the frequency of peanut allergy, while early nonoral exposure may have the opposite effect, that complement activation by peanut constituents appears to promote peanut-induced anaphylaxis and that oral immunotherapy, anti-IgE antibody, and a herbal formulation are promising approaches for the treatment of this disorder.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAnimalsHumansPeanut Hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID21051210
PMCPMC3005304
OpenAlexW2022964783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.