Trial reportClinical and experimental rheumatology
Differences in presentation of younger and older systemic sclerosis patients in clinical trials.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental rheumatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- Early- versus late-onset systemic sclerosis: differences in clinical presentation and outcome in 1037 patients.Medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the characteristics of younger and older subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) entering clinical trials.
methodsSubjects were participants in three randomised interventional trials that shared relative uniformity of demographics and disease characteristics. Only subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis were evaluated. To maximise possible differences, the lowest (age<38 years) and highest quartiles (age>53 years) were used, and a total of 264 diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) subjects were identified. For the comparison between the two age groups, generalised linear mixed or linear models with adjustment for population norms, demographics and medications were employed to assess differences attributable to subject age.
resultsAfter adjustment for population norms and study effects, differences in diastolic blood pressure, alkaline phosphatase, AST, and creatinine phosphokinase (CK) were found between the two age groups. After further adjustment for demographics, disease duration and medications, older SSc patients still had significantly higher alkaline phosphatase (11 U/L higher), and lower CK (76 U/L lower) than younger patients (p<0.003 for all). All other variables were not significantly different in the two age groups.
conclusionsClinical baseline differences exist between younger and older patients with SSc. However, after adjustment for population norms and potential confounders, including medications, only differences in alkaline phosphatise (only 11U/L) and CK (76 U/L) remain. Overall, older patients with SSc in clinical trials seem to be more similar to younger patients than was previously thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21050539PMC3741408W2399492822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.