ReviewBMC health services research2010
The challenge of long waiting lists: how we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist' appointments at an Australian public hospital.
Review in BMC health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Pooled it
- Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times.Implementation science : IS · 2013Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of an integrated primary-secondary model of care for individuals with complex type 2 diabetes: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.Diabetologia · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Ethical aspects of waiting lists in neurosurgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- A Next Available Appointment (NAA) Tool to Better Manage Patient Delay Risk and Patient Scheduling Expectations in Specialist Clinics.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Article
- Timely access to specialist outpatient care: can applying systems thinking unblock our waiting lists?BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The role of telemedicine towards improved sustainability in healthcare and societal productivity in Turkey.PloS one · 2024Article
- Factors Affecting Waiting Time of Patients Referred to Specialty Clinics from a Family Medicine Clinic in a Tertiary Government Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- An innovative model of access and triage to reduce waiting in an outpatient epilepsy clinic: an intervention study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Improving primary care referral to specialist services: a protocol for a 10-year global systematic review in the Australian context.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Patient triage to specialist outpatient clinics-time to standardize terminology.Paediatrics & child health · 2022Article
- Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Waiting Game - How Cooperation Between Public and Private Hospitals Can Help Reduce Waiting Lists.Health care management science · 2022Article
- Commentary: What should referral pathways have to improve healthcare experiences of women with female genital mutilation in Australia?Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Telemedicine in the driver's seat: new role for primary care access in Brazil and Canada: The Besrour Papers: a series on the state of family medicine in Canada and Brazil.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020Review
- How the Internet influences the relationship between outpatients and gastroenterologists: A multicenter study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Towards establishing consistency in triage in a tertiary specialty.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
our problemThe length of wait lists to access specialist clinics in the public system is problematic for Queensland Health, general practitioners and patients. To address this issue at The Townsville Hospital, the GP Liaison Officer, GPs and hospital staff including specialists, collaborated to develop a process to review patients waiting longer than two years. GPs frequently send referrals to public hospital specialist clinics. Once received, referrals are triaged to Category A, B or C depending on clinical criteria resulting in appointment timeframes of 30, 90 or 365 days for each category, respectively. However, hospitals often fail to meet these targets, creating a long wait list. These wait listed patients are only likely to be seen if their condition deteriorates and an updated referral upgrades them to Category A. PROCESS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM: A letter sent to long wait patients offered two options 1) take no action if the appointment was no longer required or 2) visit their GP to update their referral on a clinic specific template if they felt the referral was still required. Local GPs were advised of the trial and provided education on the new template and minimum data required for specialist referrals. WHAT HAPPENED: In 2008, 872 letters were sent to long wait orthopaedic patients and 101 responded. All respondents were seen at specially arranged clinics. Of these, 16 patients required procedures and the others were discharged. In 2009 the process was conducted in the specialties of orthopaedics, ENT, neurosurgery, urology, and general surgery. Via this new process 6885 patients have been contacted, 633 patients have been seen by public hospital specialists at specially arranged clinics and 197 have required a procedure. LEARNINGS: Since the start of this process in 2008, the wait time to access a specialist appointment has reduced from eight to two years. The process described here is achievable across a range of specialties, deliverable within the routine of the referral centre and identifies the small number of people on the long wait list in need of a procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.