ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2010
Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Pooled it
- The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.The patient · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.PloS one · 2023Article
- Computerized Conjoint Analysis of the Weight Treatment Preferences of Individuals With Schizophrenia.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatment Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- What Is Valued Most by Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus When Selecting Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Medications in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Examining Treatment Decision-Making Among Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Insights From a Conjoint Analysis Survey.ACR open rheumatology · 2020Article
- Patient and physician preferences for type 2 diabetes medications: a systematic review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2019Review
- What Drives Patient Choice: Preferences for Approaches to Surgical Treatments for Breast Cancer Beyond Traditional Clinical Benchmarks.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018Article
- Optimizing Selection of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Development of an Online Patient Decision Aid Using Conjoint Analysis.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Chronic anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding: when do gastroenterologists transfuse?United European gastroenterology journal · 2017Article
- A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes.The patient · 2016Article
- Preference for pharmaceutical formulation and treatment process attributes.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Review
- The Need for a Tool to Assist Health Care Professionals and Patients in Making Medication Treatment Decisions in the Clinical Management of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2015Article
- Understanding drug preferences, different perspectives.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Article
- Patients' and physicians' preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments in Spain and Portugal: a discrete choice experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Article
- Clinical utility in the treatment of type 2 diabetes with the saxagliptin/metformin fixed combination.Patient preference and adherence · 2014Review
- Physician preferences for extra-glycemic effects of type 2 diabetes treatments.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based medicine, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), support the inclusion of patients' preferences in health care decisions. In fact there are not many trials which include an assessment of patient's preferences. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that preferences of physicians and of patients can be assessed and that this information may be helpful for medical decision making.
methodOne of the established methods for assessment of preferences is the conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis, in combination with a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI), was used to collect data from 827 diabetes patients and 60 physicians, which describe the preferences expressed as levels of four factors in the management and outcome of the disease. The first factor described the main treatment effect (reduction of elevated HbA1c, improved well-being, absence of side effects, and no limitations of daily life). The second factor described the effect on the body weight (gain, no change, reduction). The third factor analyzed the mode of application (linked to meals or flexible application). The fourth factor addressed the type of product (original brand or generic product). Utility values were scaled and normalized in a way that the sum of utility points across all levels is equal to the number of attributes (factors) times 100.
resultsThe preference weights confirm that the reduction of body weight is at least as important for patients--especially obese patients--and physicians as the reduction of an elevated HbA1c. Original products were preferred by patients while general practitioners preferred generic products.
conclusionUsing the example of diabetes, the difference between patients' and physicians' preferences can be assessed. The use of a conjoint analysis in combination with CATI seems to be an effective approach for generation of data which are needed for policy and medical decision making in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.