Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21050458›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Integrative mapping analysis of chicken microchromosome 16 organization.

Romain Solinhac, Sophie Leroux, Svetlana Galkina, Olympe Chazara, Katia Feve, Florence Vignoles, Mireille Morisson, Svetlana Derjusheva, Bertrand Bed'hom, Alain Vignal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolutionary analysis of a complete chicken genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Structure of the intergenic spacers in chicken ribosomal DNA.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exact approaches for scaffolding.BMC bioinformatics · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Romain SolinhacUMR INRA/ENVT Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, 31326, France.
Sophie Leroux
Svetlana Galkina
Olympe Chazara
Katia Feve
Florence Vignoles
Mireille Morisson
Svetlana Derjusheva
Bertrand Bed'hom
Alain Vignal
Valérie Fillon
Frédérique Pitel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chicken karyotype is composed of 39 chromosome pairs, of which 9 still remain totally absent from the current genome sequence assembly, despite international efforts towards complete coverage. Some others are only very partially sequenced, amongst which microchromosome 16 (GGA16), particularly under-represented, with only 433 kb assembled for a full estimated size of 9 to 11 Mb. Besides the obvious need of full genome coverage with genetic markers for QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) mapping and major genes identification studies, there is a major interest in the detailed study of this chromosome because it carries the two genetically independent MHC complexes B and Y. In addition, GGA16 carries the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes cluster, also known as the NOR (nucleolus organizer region). The purpose of the present study is to construct and present high resolution integrated maps of GGA16 to refine its organization and improve its coverage with genetic markers.

resultsWe developed 79 STS (Sequence Tagged Site) markers to build a physical RH (radiation hybrid) map and 34 genetic markers to extend the genetic map of GGA16. We screened a BAC (Bacterial Artificial Chromosome) library with markers for the MHC-B, MHC-Y and rRNA complexes. Selected clones were used to perform high resolution FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) mapping on giant meiotic lampbrush chromosomes, allowing meiotic mapping in addition to the confirmation of the order of the three clusters along the chromosome. A region with high recombination rates and containing PO41 repeated elements separates the two MHC complexes.

conclusionsThe three complementary mapping strategies used refine greatly our knowledge of chicken microchromosome 16 organisation. The characterisation of the recombination hotspots separating the two MHC complexes demonstrates the presence of PO41 repetitive sequences both in tandem and inverted orientation. However, this region still needs to be studied in more detail.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell NucleusChickensChromosome MappingChromosomesChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialContig MappingCytogenetic AnalysisGenetic MarkersGenome, HumanHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceInterphaseMetaphaseRadiation Hybrid MappingGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21050458
PMCPMC3091757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.