Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21049059›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2010

Geographical variation in the response of visceral leishmaniasis to paromomycin in East Africa: a multicentre, open-label, randomized trial.

Asrat Hailu, Ahmed Musa, Monique Wasunna, Manica Balasegaram, Sisay Yifru, Getahun Mengistu, Zewdu Hurissa, Workagegnehu Hailu, Teklu Weldegebreal, Samson Tesfaye and 30 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Asrat HailuAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ahmed Musa
Monique Wasunna
Manica Balasegaram
Sisay Yifru
Getahun Mengistu
Zewdu Hurissa
Workagegnehu Hailu
Teklu Weldegebreal
Samson Tesfaye
Eyasu Makonnen
Eltahir Khalil
Osama Ahmed
Ahmed Fadlalla
Ahmed El-Hassan
Muzamil Raheem
Marius Mueller
Yousif Koummuki
Juma Rashid
Jane Mbui
Geoffrey Mucee
Simon Njoroge
Veronica Manduku
Alice Musibi
Geoffrey Mutuma
Fredrick Kirui
Hudson Lodenyo
Dedan Mutea
George Kirigi
Tansy Edwards
Peter Smith
Lawrence Muthami
Catherine Royce
Sally Ellis
Moses Alobo
Raymond Omollo
Josephine Kesusu
Rhoda Owiti
John Kinuthia
Leishmaniasis East Africa Platform (LEAP) group
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHUniversity of Khartoum · SDUniversity of Gondar · ETAddis Ababa University · ETArba Minch University · ETMédecins Sans Frontières · NLGadarif University · SDLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a major health problem in developing countries. The untreated disease is fatal, available treatment is expensive and often toxic, and drug resistance is increasing. Improved treatment options are needed. Paromomycin was shown to be an efficacious first-line treatment with low toxicity in India.

methodsThis was a 3-arm multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare three treatment regimens for VL in East Africa: paromomycin sulphate (PM) at 15 mg/kg/day for 21 days versus sodium stibogluconate (SSG) at 20 mg/kg/day for 30 days; and the combination of both dose regimens for 17 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was cure based on parasite-free tissue aspirates taken 6 months after treatment.

findingsOverall, 135 patients per arm were enrolled at five centres in Sudan (2 sites), Kenya (1) and Ethiopia (2), when the PM arm had to be discontinued due to poor efficacy. The trial has continued with the higher dose of PM as well as the combination of PM and SSG arms. These results will be reported later. Baseline patient characteristics were similar among treatment arms. The overall cure with PM was significantly inferior to that with SSG (63.8% versus 92.2%; difference 28.5%, 95%CI 18.8% to 38.8%, p<0.001). The efficacy of PM varied among centres and was significantly lower in Sudan (14.3% and 46.7%) than in Kenya (80.0%) and Ethiopia (75.0% and 96.6%). No major safety issues with PM were identified.

conclusionThe efficacy of PM at 15 mg/kg/day for 21 days was inadequate, particularly in Sudan. The efficacy of higher doses and the combination treatment warrant further studies.

Indexed as

GeographyAdolescentAdultAfrica, EasternAntiprotozoal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLeishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleMiddle AgedParomomycinTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntiprotozoal AgentsParomomycin

Identifiers

PMID21049059
PMCPMC2964287
OpenAlexW2136086972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.