ArticlePloS one2010
DREAM4: Combining genetic and dynamic information to identify biological networks and dynamical models.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale learning of gene network-driven phenotypic dynamics of single cells.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks for gene regulatory network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Article
- Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- GeneSNAKE: a Python package for simulation of gene regulatory networks and perturbation-induced expression data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- HSTXGB: a hyperparameter self-tuning XGBoost method integrating pre- and post-processing for gene regulatory network inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Inferring the regulation dynamics of oscillatory networks from scRNA-seq data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping the transcriptional regulatory network of a fungal pathogen by exploiting transcription factor perturbation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Robust signalling entropy estimation for biological process characterisation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Ultralow-Dimensionality Reduction for Identifying Critical Transitions by Spatial-Temporal PCA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A high-resolution model of gene expression during Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) fiber development.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Gene network centrality analysis identifies key regulators coordinating day-night metabolic transitions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- LogicGep: Boolean networks inference using symbolic regression from time-series transcriptomic profiling data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Inference of gene regulatory networks based on directed graph convolutional networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Decoding the principle of cell-fate determination for its reverse control.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Single-cell multi-omics analysis identifies context-specific gene regulatory gates and mechanisms.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Approaches for Benchmarking Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Methods.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Review
- A review on gene regulatory network reconstruction algorithms based on single cell RNA sequencing.Genes & genomics · 2024Review
- Article
- NetProphet 3: a machine learning framework for transcription factor network mapping and multi-omics integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent technologies have lead to the availability of multiple genomic data types in sufficient quantity and quality to serve as a basis for automatic global network inference. Accordingly, there are currently a large variety of network inference methods that learn regulatory networks to varying degrees of detail. These methods have different strengths and weaknesses and thus can be complementary. However, combining different methods in a mutually reinforcing manner remains a challenge. METHODOLOGY: We investigate how three scalable methods can be combined into a useful network inference pipeline. The first is a novel t-test-based method that relies on a comprehensive steady-state knock-out dataset to rank regulatory interactions. The remaining two are previously published mutual information and ordinary differential equation based methods (tlCLR and Inferelator 1.0, respectively) that use both time-series and steady-state data to rank regulatory interactions; the latter has the added advantage of also inferring dynamic models of gene regulation which can be used to predict the system's response to new perturbations. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our t-test based method proved powerful at ranking regulatory interactions, tying for first out of methods in the DREAM4 100-gene in-silico network inference challenge. We demonstrate complementarity between this method and the two methods that take advantage of time-series data by combining the three into a pipeline whose ability to rank regulatory interactions is markedly improved compared to either method alone. Moreover, the pipeline is able to accurately predict the response of the system to new conditions (in this case new double knock-out genetic perturbations). Our evaluation of the performance of multiple methods for network inference suggests avenues for future methods development and provides simple considerations for genomic experimental design. Our code is publicly available at http://err.bio.nyu.edu/inferelator/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.