Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21048963›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2010

Obtaining valid laboratory data in clinical trials conducted in resource diverse settings: lessons learned from a microbicide phase III clinical trial.

Tania Crucitti, Katrien Fransen, Rashika Maharaj, Tom Tenywa, Marguerite Massinga Loembé, Kailapuri Gangatharan Murugavel, Kevin Mendonca, Said Abdellati, Greet Beelaert, Lut Van Damme

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00153777 (Randomized Controlled Trial of 6% Cellulose Sulfate Gel and the Effect on Vaginal HIV Transmission), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00153777 phase3terminatednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of 6% Cellulose Sulfate Gel and the Effect on Vaginal HIV Transmission

TypeinterventionalSponsorCONRADRan2005 to 2007Enrolled1,428ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsCellulose Sulfate gel (6%)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Tania CrucittiHIV/STI Reference Laboratory, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. tcrucitti@itg.be
Katrien Fransen
Rashika Maharaj
Tom Tenywa
Marguerite Massinga Loembé
Kailapuri Gangatharan Murugavel
Kevin Mendonca
Said Abdellati
Greet Beelaert
Lut Van Damme
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEFamily Health International 360 · USMakerere University · UGSouth African Medical Research Council · ZASt.John's Medical College Hospital · INUniversité Laval · CAYR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade several phase III microbicides trials have been conducted in developing countries. However, laboratories in resource constrained settings do not always have the experience, infrastructure, and the capacity to deliver laboratory data meeting the high standards of clinical trials. This paper describes the design and outcomes of a laboratory quality assurance program which was implemented during a phase III clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the candidate microbicide Cellulose Sulfate 6% (CS) [1]. METHODOLOGY: In order to assess the effectiveness of CS for HIV and STI prevention, a phase III clinical trial was conducted in 5 sites: 3 in Africa and 2 in India. The trial sponsor identified an International Central Reference Laboratory (ICRL), responsible for the design and management of a quality assurance program, which would guarantee the reliability of laboratory data. The ICRL provided advice on the tests, assessed local laboratories, organized trainings, conducted supervision visits, performed re-tests, and prepared control panels. Local laboratories were provided with control panels for HIV rapid tests and Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae (CT/NG) amplification technique. Aliquots from respective control panels were tested by local laboratories and were compared with results obtained at the ICRL.

resultsOverall, good results were observed. However, discordances between the ICRL and site laboratories were identified for HIV and CT/NG results. One particular site experienced difficulties with HIV rapid testing shortly after study initiation. At all sites, DNA contamination was identified as a cause of invalid CT/NG results. Both problems were timely detected and solved. Through immediate feedback, guidance and repeated training of laboratory staff, additional inaccuracies were prevented.

conclusionsQuality control guidelines when applied in field laboratories ensured the reliability and validity of final study data. It is essential that sponsors provide adequate resources for implementation of such comprehensive technical assessment and monitoring systems.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00153777 and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95638385.

Indexed as

AfricaAnti-Infective Agents, LocalDeveloping CountriesHumansIndiaQuality ControlAnti-Infective Agents, Local

Identifiers

PMID21048963
PMCPMC2965094
OpenAlexW2160790523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.