Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21047387›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Inferring gene regulatory networks from asynchronous microarray data with AIRnet.

David Oviatt, Mark Clement, Quinn Snell, Kenneth Sundberg, Chun Wan J Lai, Jared Allen, Randall Roper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David OviattDepartment of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. xkordave@gmail.com
Mark Clement
Quinn Snell
Kenneth Sundberg
Chun Wan J Lai
Jared Allen
Randall Roper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern approaches to treating genetic disorders, cancers and even epidemics rely on a detailed understanding of the underlying gene signaling network. Previous work has used time series microarray data to infer gene signaling networks given a large number of accurate time series samples. Microarray data available for many biological experiments is limited to a small number of arrays with little or no time series guarantees. When several samples are averaged to examine differences in mean value between a diseased and normal state, information from individual samples that could indicate a gene relationship can be lost.

resultsAsynchronous Inference of Regulatory Networks (AIRnet) provides gene signaling network inference using more practical assumptions about the microarray data. By learning correlation patterns for the changes in microarray values from all pairs of samples, accurate network reconstructions can be performed with data that is normally available in microarray experiments.

conclusionsBy focussing on the changes between microarray samples, instead of absolute values, increased information can be gleaned from expression data.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingMice

Identifiers

PMID21047387
PMCPMC2975420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.