ReviewAdolescent medicine: state of the art reviews2010
Human papillomavirus disease and vaccines in adolescents.
Review in Adolescent medicine: state of the art reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in adolescence and adherence to cervical cancer screening in Switzerland: a national cross-sectional survey.International journal of public health · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality of life valuations of HPV-associated cancer health states by the general population.Sexually transmitted infections · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Review of the most recent evidence indicates that screening for cervical cancer in females younger than 21 years of age likely leads to more harm than good. In addition, screening during adolescence has not lead to decreased cervical cancers in this age group. The rate of cervical cancer remains extremely low in adolescents. In contrast, abnormal cytology is extremely common, of which most is benign. Hence, referral to colposcopy is unnecessary and costly. New guidelines recommend cervical cancer screening to start at the age of 21 years and to not be based on sexual behavior. The exception is for immunocompromised girls, who should be screened once intercourse is initiated, since they are at increased risk for cervical cancer. Recently, we have also broadened our understanding about human papillomavirus-associated disease in men. In this chapter, we cover the advances in science that have led to new screening recommendation for cervical cancer and the advances in prevention: vaccines for both adolescent women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21047033PMC3057670W2253139149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.