Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21046614›Full record

ReviewProteomics2010

Image analysis tools and emerging algorithms for expression proteomics.

Andrew W Dowsey, Jane A English, Frederique Lisacek, Jeffrey S Morris, Guang-Zhong Yang, Michael J Dunn

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew W DowseyInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK. a.w.dowsey@imperial.ac.uk
Jane A English
Frederique Lisacek
Jeffrey S Morris
Guang-Zhong Yang
Michael J Dunn

Funding

Adaptive Methodology for Functional Biomedical DataR01CA107304 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MORRIS, JEFFREY S · 2004 to 2011
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA107304NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their origins in academic endeavours in the 1970s, computational analysis tools have matured into a number of established commercial packages that underpin research in expression proteomics. In this paper we describe the image analysis pipeline for the established 2-DE technique of protein separation, and by first covering signal analysis for MS, we also explain the current image analysis workflow for the emerging high-throughput 'shotgun' proteomics platform of LC coupled to MS (LC/MS). The bioinformatics challenges for both methods are illustrated and compared, whereas existing commercial and academic packages and their workflows are described from both a user's and a technical perspective. Attention is given to the importance of sound statistical treatment of the resultant quantifications in the search for differential expression. Despite wide availability of proteomics software, a number of challenges have yet to be overcome regarding algorithm accuracy, objectivity and automation, generally due to deterministic spot-centric approaches that discard information early in the pipeline, propagating errors. We review recent advances in signal and image analysis algorithms in 2-DE, MS, LC/MS and Imaging MS. Particular attention is given to wavelet techniques, automated image-based alignment and differential analysis in 2-DE, Bayesian peak mixture models, and functional mixed modelling in MS, and group-wise consensus alignment methods for LC/MS.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene ExpressionAnimalsChromatography, LiquidData Interpretation, StatisticalElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMass SpectrometryProteomeSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedProteome

Identifiers

PMID21046614
PMCPMC3257807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.