Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21046368›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2010

Assessment of across-muscle coherence using multi-unit vs. single-unit recordings.

Jamie A Johnston, Gabriele Formicone, Thomas M Hamm, Marco Santello

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural Mechanisms Underlying High-Frequency Vestibulocollic Reflexes In Humans And Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  2. Modifying motor unit territory placement in the Fuglevand model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017
    Article
  3. Neural bases of hand synergies.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie A JohnstonFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gabriele Formicone
Thomas M Hamm
Marco Santello

Funding

RECURRENT RENSHAW CIRCUITR01NS022454 · NINDS · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSP/MED CTR (PHOENIX) · PI HAMM, THOMAS M · 1986 to 2006
$2.1M
Neural Control of GraspingR01AR047301 · NIAMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SANTELLO, MARCO · 2002 to 2011
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047301NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR47301-01A2NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS022454NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS22454-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coherence between electromyographic (EMG) signals has been used to identify correlated neural inputs to motor units (MUs) innervating different muscles. Simulations using a motor-unit model (Fuglevand et al. 1992) were performed to determine the ability of coherence between two multi-unit EMGs (mEMG) to detect correlated MU activity and the range of correlation strengths in which mEMG coherence can be usefully employed. Coherence between motor-unit and mEMG activities in two muscles was determined as we varied the strength of a 30-Hz periodic common input, the number of correlated MU pairs and variability of MU discharge relative to the common input. Pooled and mEMG coherence amplitudes positively and negatively accelerated, respectively, toward the strongest and most widespread correlating inputs. Furthermore, the relation between pooled and mEMG coherence was also nonlinear and was essentially the same whether correlation strength varied by changing common input strength or its distribution. However, the most important finding is that while the mEMG coherence saturates at the strongest common input strengths, this occurs at common input strengths greater than found in most physiological studies. Thus, we conclude that mEMG coherence would be a useful measure in many experimental conditions and our simulation results suggest further guidelines for using and interpreting coherence between mEMG signals.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorMotor NeuronsMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeuromuscular JunctionNonlinear DynamicsSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID21046368
PMCPMC5706539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.