ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2011
Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Apixaban Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Dose Assessment in Pediatric Patients with Congenital or Acquired Heart Disease.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Trial
- Trial
- All You Need to Know About Allometric Scaling: An Integrative Review on the Theoretical Basis, Empirical Evidence, and Application in Human Pharmacology.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of apixaban in pediatric subjects at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Article
- R-praziquantel integrated population pharmacokinetics in preschool- and school-aged African children infected with Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium and Lao adults infected with Opisthorchis viverrini.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022Article
- Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing evaluation of gentamicin in neonates using PhysPK.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- A decision support tool to find the best cyclosporine dose when switching from intravenous to oral route in pediatric stem cell transplant patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Pharmacokinetics of clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam in children with dravet syndrome receiving concomitant stiripentol and valproic Acid.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2015Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of busulfan in pediatric and young adult patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant: a model-based dosing algorithm for personalized therapy and implementation into routine clinical use.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2015Article
- A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.Paediatric drugs · 2013Article
- Optimal sampling times for a drug and its metabolite using SIMCYP(®) simulations as prior information.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Article
- Application of ED-optimality to screening experiments for analgesic compounds in an experimental model of neuropathic pain.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012Article
- First dose in children: physiological insights into pharmacokinetic scaling approaches and their implications in paediatric drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to determine whether optimizing the study design in terms of ages and sampling times for a drug eliminated solely via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) would allow us to accurately estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters throughout the entire childhood timespan, while taking into account age- and weight-related changes. A linear monocompartmental model with first-order absorption was used successively with three different residual error models and previously published pharmacokinetic parameters ("true values"). The optimal ages were established by D-optimization using the CYP3A4 maturation function to create "optimized demographic databases." The post-dose times for each previously selected age were determined by D-optimization using the pharmacokinetic model to create "optimized sparse sampling databases." We simulated concentrations by applying the population pharmacokinetic model to the optimized sparse sampling databases to create optimized concentration databases. The latter were modeled to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters. We then compared true and estimated parameter values. The established optimal design comprised four age ranges: 0.008 years old (i.e., around 3 days), 0.192 years old (i.e., around 2 months), 1.325 years old, and adults, with the same number of subjects per group and three or four samples per subject, in accordance with the error model. The population pharmacokinetic parameters that we estimated with this design were precise and unbiased (root mean square error [RMSE] and mean prediction error [MPE] less than 11% for clearance and distribution volume and less than 18% for k(a)), whereas the maturation parameters were unbiased but less precise (MPE < 6% and RMSE < 37%). Based on our results, taking growth and maturation into account a priori in a pediatric pharmacokinetic study is theoretically feasible. However, it requires that very early ages be included in studies, which may present an obstacle to the use of this approach. First-pass effects, alternative elimination routes, and combined elimination pathways should also be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21046208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.