Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21046170›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2010

[Experiences of cancer patients with breakthrough pain and pharmacological treatments].

L Bertram, S Stiel, F Elsner, L Radbruch, A Davies, F Nauck, B Alt-Epping

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L BertramKlinik für Palliativmedizin, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Deutschland. lbertram@ukaachen.de
S Stiel
F Elsner
L Radbruch
A Davies
F Nauck
B Alt-Epping

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundof cancer patients receiving palliative care, 80% suffer from cancer pain, and again 80% of these patients report breakthrough pain. This study explores the patients' perception of breakthrough pain, their experiences with existing therapeutic regimens and their expectations regarding an ideal breakthrough pain medication.

methodfrom November 2008 to February 2010 two German palliative care units recruited 80 in- or outpatient cancer patients who completed a standardized questionnaire on breakthrough pain characteristics, analgesic medication, attitudes towards new treatment approaches for breakthrough pain, and experiences with alternative routes of drug administration as part of the "European Survey of Oncology Patients' Experience of Breakthrough Pain".

resultsthe study participants suffered from 1-12 episodes of either incident (47.5%) or spontaneous pain (37.5%) per day which were perceived as "severe" in 71% of all cases. These exacerbations highly interfered with the patients' general activity, mood, walking ability, and normal work. Overall, 64% of the patients reported alleviation from pharmacological (26%) and non-pharmacological (73%) interventions. Subcutaneous (40%) and oral (39%) routes were used frequently; intranasal (1.25%) and intrapulmonary (1.25%) routes were used rarely. Only 64% of all participants stated an overall satisfaction with their breakthrough analgesia.

conclusionthe diagnosis and treatment of breakthrough pain seems to be conducted in a suboptimal manner, and standard recommendations on breakthrough pain relief are not implemented consistently. Possible causes of pain should be taken into account as well as multi-professional treatment interventions and alternative routes of administration of fast onset, effective drugs should be considered.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePatient SatisfactionActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration RoutesDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFemaleHumansIntractable PainMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.