Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21046002›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2010

Midclavicular fracture: not just a trivial injury: current treatment options.

Gereon Schiffer, Christoph Faymonville, Emmanouil Skouras, Jonas Andermahr, Axel Jubel

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reliability of preoperative conventional X-ray diagnostics for multifragmentary midclavicular fractures - a retrospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Complications of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in a Level I Trauma Center.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gereon SchifferKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Schwerpunkt Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Köln, Germany. gereon.schiffer@uk-koeln.de
Christoph Faymonville
Emmanouil Skouras
Jonas Andermahr
Axel Jubel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConservative treatment was long recommended for midclavicular fractures because of the excellent results that were reported in the 1960's and 70's. Recently, however, the rucksack bandage has received competition from surgical treatment. The spectrum of operations ranges from classic plate osteosynthesis to intramedullary techniques and angle-stable implants.

methodsWe present and evaluate the current treatment options on the basis of a selective review of the literature.

resultsRecent studies have confirmed some long-held concepts and refuted others. The risk of non-union after conservative treatment was previously reported as 1% to 2% but has turned out to be much higher in selected subgroups such as in patients with severe displacement, female patients, and patients of advanced age. Furthermore, new implants and techniques have made surgery safer and more likely to result in bony union.

conclusionIn any case of midclavicular fracture, the type of fracture should be precisely analyzed and an individual treatment strategy should be developed in view of the patient's particular situation. Current studies show with a high level of evidence (level 1) that patients with dislocated fractures benefit from surgery.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesBone ScrewsClavicleFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneFractures, UnunitedHumansImmobilizationMalePrevalenceSex FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21046002
PMCPMC2967797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.