The 3rd International EuroFIR Congress 2009: European Food Composition Data for Better Diet, Nutrition and Food Quality.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Food Composition Data and Tools Online and Their Use in Research and Policy: EuroFIR AISBL Contribution in 2022.Nutrients · 2022
   Article
2. Development and Validation of the Brief Folate-Specific Food Frequency Questionnaire for Young Women's Diet Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
   Article
3. Validity and Reproducibility of the Iodine Dietary Intake Questionnaire Assessment Conducted for Young Polish Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
   Article
4. Plasma and dietary antioxidant status as cardiovascular disease risk factors: a review of human studies.Nutrients · 2013
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as